5 Best Laptops for Revit 2026 (Latest Update)
The best laptop for Revit will depend on whether you are a student or a professional:
As for prices:
- A portable laptop with ANY dedicated GPU will be more expensive.
- If you work mostly in an office, you can make do with a heavier machine, which will be much less expensive.
A faster and easier way to make sure you buy the right laptop is to look at the size of your projects:

A) If you work on 10-story houses or small buildings (files in the ~50MB range), you only need to spend 500-700 dollars. (2-4GB vRAM dGPU).
B) If files are in the range of 1GB or more: a 4GB-8GB vRAM GPU. You do not need more than an 8GB vRAM GPU. However, 16-32GB RAM and a recent Core i7/Ryzen 7 CPU (900-1300 dollars) are a must.
Most people I’ve worked with fall into category A.
What about workstation GPUs?
If we are talking about Revit, they are unnecessary for most users.
Why?
Revit is mostly CPU-dependent. The GPU helps with viewport performance (rotating a model in 3D).
But viewport navigation and drafting are still mostly CPU-dependent tasks.
Best Laptop Specs for Revit
Let us be a bit more specific about the hardware you need (you can find more details at the end).
Keep the following in mind when reading these recommendations and reviews:
Small = 3-10-story building/house
Big = facility/large building
CPU
Although recent versions of Revit have implemented more multi-threaded functions (they use multiple CPU cores)…
The large majority of design tasks are not heavily multithreaded; they mostly use the speed of one core or one thread. Thus, simply having more CPU cores is not necessarily going to speed up drawing or modeling.

What about rendering?
Rendering at draft quality will be nearly instantaneous with any modern CPU.
Rendering at higher quality will benefit from more CORES. However, since most modern CPUs have at least 6 cores, rendering should still be plenty fast regardless of the exact number of cores.
Recommended CPUs
Students & small models: Any 8th-14th-generation Intel Core i5, newer Intel Core 5/Core Ultra 5, or 3rd-8th-generation Ryzen 5 CPU. Ex: Core i5-13420H / Ryzen 5 7535HS. Older generations (Ex: 8th-gen Intel/3rd-gen Ryzen) will be somewhat slower when rendering but will have more or less the same performance when drafting.
Pros / bigger models: An “H” or “HX” Core i5 or Ryzen 5 CPU (Ex: Core i5-13420H / Ryzen 5 7535HS) is good too, but a Core i7, Core Ultra 7, or Ryzen 7 is recommended. Ex: Core i7-14700HX / Ryzen 7 8845HS
GPU
A dedicated graphics card with its own ‘vRAM‘ (video RAM) makes viewport actions smoother: zooming, navigating, and rotating a 3D model.
Students or small models: Even 2GB vRAM GPUs like the MX450 and MX550 will do. Although 4GB vRAM dGPUs like the GTX 1650 and RTX 2050 are overkill, they are often not much more expensive.
Recent integrated GPUs will work with small models too. Use this chart to see where you can find the fastest integrated graphics.
Pros or large models: At least 4GB of vRAM is recommended: GTX 1650, RTX 2050, RTX 3050. GPUs with 6GB-8GB of vRAM are more future-proof: RTX 3060, RTX 4050, RTX 5050, etc.

Warning: Do not spend money on a high-end GPU with more than 8GB of vRAM UNLESS you are also using third-party GPU renderers. Rendering inside Revit is primarily a CPU task, and navigating through a large, complex 3D model will often benefit more from additional system RAM than additional vRAM.
RAM
8GB: Enough for small models or ~50MB files, although 16GB is a much more practical starting point for recent versions of Revit.
16GB: A must for larger files or multitasking. Ex: running Revit + SketchUp, Photoshop, or Navisworks.
32GB: Recommended for professional work, larger projects, and heavy multitasking. It can also reduce slowdowns during rendering and other memory-heavy tasks.
64GB: Helps when working with extremely large and complex models. Ex: dense and intricate HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems, particularly those with highly detailed ductwork, piping, and mechanical equipment.
Storage
An SSD is a MUST. Solid-state drives massively improve any task involving reading or writing file data.
As I showed in my post, Laptop storage speed comparison, the differences are minimal when it comes to real-world application performance. There is no need to be picky about which PCIe generation you choose UNLESS you know you are going to transfer lots and lots of files several times a day. In that case, a newer PCIe SSD may be a good investment.
Display
You are going to be staring at this thing for how many hours a day? Right. So, besides using the 20-20-20 rule, you want a large display and, if possible, a high-resolution QHD display. The extra screen space and resolution gained from QHD over FHD are SIGNIFICANT.
A matte finish is a nice bonus because it makes the display easier on the eyes. If you cannot get a matte display, you can always buy an anti-glare filter.
Top 5 Best Laptops For Revit
When you pick a laptop from this list, keep the following in mind:
A) All laptops have fast CPUs with the recommended specifications, so drawing and modeling performance will be almost the same.
B) VIEWPORT and rendering performance will depend on the number of CPU cores, RAM, and GPU. If you work with 500MB-1GB files, you need a GPU with at least 4GB of vRAM AND you need to maximize RAM.
C) For ~50MB files, a laptop with a Core i5 or Ryzen 5 CPU and a 2GB-4GB vRAM GPU is enough.
1. Lenovo LOQ Essential
Best Budget Laptop For Revit

Intel Core i5-12450HX
8GB DDR5
GeForce RTX 2050 4GB vRAM
256GB SSD
15.6” FHD 144Hz
Gaming laptop weight class
2 hours
If you are an architect, civil engineer, or interior designer working for a small firm that has a small team of CAD engineers, it isn’t likely you’ll be working with projects that require a high amount of vRAM.
Most of your work will be limited to buildings, apartments, small houses, schools, etc., and for that you need NOTHING more than a 4GB vRAM GPU. In fact, the 4GB vRAM GPU on this laptop is OVERKILL because Revit doesn’t use the GPU for all functions except for viewport, which is basically rotating and navigating a model in 3D.
Hardware
A 4GB vRAM GPU should be enough to viewport into buildings with 20-40 floors.
Truth is… these kinds of projects can run on integrated graphics, but you’ll start to lag somewhat if you have to work on the details inside every floor. Viewport and walkthroughs, especially after applying a high-quality render, will flicker and run somewhat slowly with an integrated graphics card. However, nothing dramatic.
Having a 4GB vRAM GPU prevents all of that and makes navigating through these projects smooth.
You can even opt for a 2GB vRAM GPU and have the same smoothness in viewport, but those laptops with 2GB vRAM GPUs are only slightly cheaper.
3050RTX/1650GTX vs 2050RTX:
The most powerful 4GB vRAM GPU is the 3050Ti, followed by the 3050RTX Non-Ti. However, both are on average 100-150 dollars more expensive. Are they worth the extra cash? No.
vRAM is the same, and though they have more CUDA cores, they do not help with standard Revit rendering because rendering is primarily CPU-dependent. As for the 1650GTX, it has pretty much the same performance as the RTX 2050. However, those laptops will usually come with a slower, slightly older CPU.
vRAY & GPU Rendering
If you’re using GPU renderers like vRAY, then the 3050Ti may be worth the extra cash ONLY if the render previews have very highly detailed textures and take long to render. This will improve your workflow because you can render textures/shaders faster. If you’re only doing standard Revit work, the RTX 2050 is still enough.
CPU: Core i5-12450HX
The problem with cheaper 1650GTX laptops, which have approximately the same GPU performance as the RTX 2050, is that they usually come with older CPUs. Some even have a 9th-generation Intel Core i5 CPU!
This laptop is by no means the fastest or the latest. However, the Core i5-12450HX is stronger than the regular Core i5-12450H you usually see in cheaper gaming laptops, and that matters for Revit. Revit is still very dependent on CPU performance, especially for model responsiveness, loading views, switching between sheets, and rendering. Single-thread performance is substantially higher than older generations and still close enough to more recent generations for this type of budget Revit laptop.
Of course, you can make do with those old CPUs too.
Rendering may take 10 minutes longer and so on, but nothing that will compromise your workflow significantly. However, RTX 2050 laptops now cost just as much as older 1650GTX laptops, and this Lenovo LOQ Essential gives you a much newer Core i5 HX CPU.
Again, even if you find a cheaper laptop with a 1650GTX, the price difference won’t be worth the loss in CPU performance between the laptops. Of course, if you find a 1650GTX laptop with the same CPU class as this one, by all means go for it.
What about Ryzen CPUs?
Ryzen 5 CPUs can be a better option than Intel counterparts. Simply because Ryzen 5 CPUs, as shown in my post comparing the performance of Ryzen vs Intel laptop CPUs, have better multi-core performance. This means each core runs at almost the same clock speed ACROSS all cores, which isn’t always the case with Intel. Better multi-core performance means FASTER rendering and also SLIGHTLY faster viewport.
That said, this Lenovo LOQ Essential is still attractive because the Core i5-12450HX gives you strong CPU performance for the price. If you find a Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 7 laptop with the same RTX 2050 and better RAM/storage for the same price, that can also be a great choice.
RAM & Storage: 8GB DDR5 vs 16GB DDR5
Unlike older budget gaming laptops, this laptop supports DDR5 RAM, which is still the fastest common RAM technology on budget gaming laptops. If we are talking about budget laptops with dedicated graphics, you’ll usually find DDR5 RAM on laptops with newer Intel CPUs or recent Ryzen 5 CPUs.
Performance gains with DDR5 vs DDR4, however, aren’t huge for Revit. I’d estimate things would run slightly faster in viewport. However, rendering and heavy multitasking can improve more noticeably if you also have enough total RAM.
The main drawback of this specific Lenovo LOQ Essential is that it comes with only 8GB RAM out of the box. That is fine for simple Revit models, classes, small houses, and light interior design work, but it is not ideal for serious Revit use. If you buy this laptop, I’d treat the RAM upgrade to 16GB as the first upgrade. If you work with larger projects or render often, 32GB is even better. You can follow my guide here: how to upgrade RAM on a laptop.
Storage: 1TB is ideal to store pretty much every project you work on during 5 years. However, this model only comes with 256GB. This is the biggest practical limitation after the RAM. It should not be an issue if you use external storage to save older projects, or the cloud, but if this is going to be your main work laptop, upgrade the storage as shown in my how to upgrade storage guide.
| Lenovo LOQ Essential | |
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
2. ASUS TUF Gaming A16
The Best Laptop For Revit 2026

AMD Ryzen 7 7445HS
16GB DDR5
NVIDIA RTX 4050 6GB vRAM
512GB SSD
16” Full HD+ 145Hz Display
Gaming laptop weight class
2 hours
A 6GB vRAM dedicated GPU laptop will give you the best performance/money ratio as far as Revit goes.
You’ll have smooth walkthroughs with shaders/textures with vRAY & smooth viewport with very complex & large models on Revit without having to pay for an 8GB vRAM dGPU, which can cost an extra 500-800 dollars.
Going beyond 6GB vRAM isn’t a bad move, but the performance gains will be very, very small for standard Revit work. However, if you use vRAY and GPU renderers, the performance gains will be more significant.
GPU: RTX 4050 6GB vRAM
RTX 4050 vs All other 6GB vRAM GPUs:
When you shop for mid-tier dedicated graphics on laptops, in other words, 6GB vRAM dedicated graphics, the most important single GPU spec after the CPU is “GPU wattage“. This concept is useful for gaming but can be extended to viewport & rendering tasks since higher wattage means that each “CORE” of the GPU will do graphics processing at much higher clock speeds.
CUDA Cores vs vRAM
You already know vRAM is the memory where your model is stored for FAST 3D manipulation. It pretty much acts the same way RAM does for software/Windows.
CUDA cores act the same way CPU cores do. They have clock speeds, and a GPU can have far more cores than a CPU. These little cores do all the graphics & image processing, such as viewport/rendering shaders/etc. If you want a basic explanation, check my post on what CUDA cores are.
If you have these CUDA cores running at FASTER speeds, then obviously the graphics processing will be faster and the performance with 3D objects & images will be faster. This is why you should always try to get a GPU running at higher wattages if the price difference is small. Higher power input means more energy for each of these cores to reach their maximum potential.
When you pick a higher wattage GPU as opposed to a lower wattage GPU, and they can be the exact same GPU just running at different power, the most obvious performance gains will be seen when you use GPU renderers like vRAY. However, if you’re NOT using third-party renderers besides the default rendering engine on Revit, you DO NOT NEED to worry too much about GPU wattage.
Unfortunately, wattage isn’t always listed clearly by manufacturers.
So you will need to do some research on your own to find out what the wattage is before purchase.
Large models: 4GB vRAM vs 6GB vRAM?
I’ve had to work with large models on several occasions, and as far as viewport, 3D manipulation, and navigating through a model is concerned, me and my colleague saw no major performance difference between 4GB vRAM and 6GB vRAM on typical projects.
However… when we worked on a file in the range of ~2GB, basically the design of a residential building in a block, the model included all houses around the block AND the residential building had VERY detailed interiors with plugins to add high-quality objects and such, LOD 400-500.
Viewport was faster with the 6GB vRAM GPU, around 60fps, compared to the 4GB vRAM GPU, around 35-40fps. This difference is significant but it doesn’t always translate to a dramatically smoother workflow. However, these results can be extrapolated to much more complex models, and there should be a significant performance difference on viewport then.
CPU: Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Core i7 HX
This laptop has a strong Ryzen 7 7445HS CPU. It is not the absolute fastest Ryzen 7 laptop CPU, and it is not as multi-core heavy as some Ryzen 7 8845HS or Core i7 HX models, but it is still a high-performance HS-class CPU. For Revit, that is what matters most because drawing, modeling, loading views, and navigating projects depend heavily on CPU speed.
As I showed in my “Intel vs Ryzen Laptop CPU Performance Comparison“…. both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance matter. A higher-end Core i7 HX or Ryzen 7 8845HS can be faster, especially in rendering, but they often add a lot more to the total price. You’ll get better bang for your buck with the Ryzen 7 7445HS shown here because it is still fast enough for large Revit models while keeping the laptop price more reasonable.
For drawing/modeling and viewport, performance differences should be minimal compared with other strong Ryzen 7/Core i7 laptops. However, performance differences when rendering will be more noticeable. A three-story house on a 500m sq area with details outside may take a few extra minutes compared with a higher-end Core i7 HX or Ryzen 7 8845HS, but it will still be much faster than older Core i5/Ryzen 5 budget laptops.
RAM & Storage: 16GB DDR5 + 512GB SSD
The 16GB DDR5 RAM is exactly what I want to see on a Revit laptop in this price range. Unlike cheaper 8GB models, you don’t have to upgrade the RAM immediately just to make Revit feel normal. For small to medium projects, 16GB is enough. If you work with large projects, multiple linked models, or heavy rendering, then 32GB RAM is the better long-term upgrade.
Performance gains with DDR5 vs DDR4 are not massive for Revit, but DDR5 is still what you want on a newer laptop. The bigger deal is the total amount of RAM. Going from 8GB to 16GB is a much bigger improvement than simply going from DDR4 to DDR5. If you want to upgrade later, check my guide on how to upgrade RAM on a laptop.
Storage: 1TB is ideal to store pretty much every project you work on during 5 years. However, this model comes with 512GB SSD. This should not be an issue if you use external storage to save older projects, or the cloud, or just simply upgrade storage as shown in my how to upgrade storage guide.
Display: 16″ Full HD+ 145Hz
The display is another reason I like this laptop more than most basic 15-inch RTX 4050 laptops. A 16″ Full HD+ display usually gives you more vertical space than a standard 15.6″ FHD panel, and that matters in Revit because you have toolbars, properties, project browser, view tabs, and the model area all fighting for space.
The 145Hz refresh rate is mostly a gaming feature, but the 16-inch size and Full HD+ layout are useful for Revit work. If you want a deeper explanation of display resolution and workspace, check my post on QHD vs FHD displays on laptops.
| ASUS TUF Gaming A16 | |
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
3. HP 15.6 inch Laptop
Best Cheap Laptop For Revit 2026

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
8GB RAM
AMD Radeon Graphics
512GB SSD
15.6” HD Touchscreen Display
Lightweight 15-inch laptop class
6-7 hours
Windows 11 Home
For most people using Revit, especially interior designers, there’s no need for dedicated graphics if the projects are small.
That’s because small models, such as one house or small apartments, use very little video memory and rely far more on RAM and the CPU. Thus, the graphics cards that come by default on laptops, also called integrated GPUs, should be enough for this type of work.
GPU: Integrated
Of course, that doesn’t mean you should pick any integrated graphics.
You always want to get the best bang for your buck.
On laptops, you cannot browse laptops by integrated graphics as easily as you can with dedicated GPUs. You usually browse by the CPU instead. A particular integrated graphics chip, let’s call it an iGPU, will come with specific CPUs. Basically, they come in pairs.
Intel Xe, Vega 7, or Radeon 610M
The integrated GPUs on Ryzen CPUs and Intel CPUs are not all the same. Older Ryzen 5 laptops can come with Radeon RX Vega graphics, while newer budget Ryzen 5 7520U laptops usually come with AMD Radeon 610M. Intel models may come with Intel Iris Xe, and newer expensive laptops may have Intel Arc or stronger Radeon 680M/780M-class integrated graphics.
The problem is that the fastest integrated graphics are usually found on much more expensive CPUs, which defeats the whole purpose since we are resorting to integrated graphics due to lack of money.
| GPU | CPU |
| Intel Iris Xe 80 (1600Mhz) | Core i5 1135G7 |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Core i5 1230U |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Core i5 1345U |
| RX Vega 7 | Ryzen 5 5500U |
| RX Vega 7 | Ryzen 5 7530U |
| Radeon 610M | Ryzen 5 7520U |
This laptop uses AMD Radeon Graphics from the Ryzen 5 7520U platform, which is usually the Radeon 610M-class integrated graphics. It is on the weaker side compared with Vega 7 or Intel Iris Xe, but in return you’re getting a recent Ryzen 5 CPU, a 512GB SSD, and a very low price.
CPU: Ryzen 5 vs Ryzen 3 / Core i3
The Ryzen 5 7520U on this laptop is significantly faster than most Ryzen 3 and Core i3 laptops in the same budget range. If you buy the cheaper Ryzen 3 versions, you will have a MASSIVE performance loss due to the CPU being much slower as shown in this post.
You should ALWAYS opt for the most recent CPU you can afford, even if you have to pay 50 dollars more. If not, you’ll be missing out on the performance gains that come from higher clock speeds and more efficient cores. It won’t necessarily make your workflow slow, but these performance boosts can definitely impact how fast you finish the design process, especially if you render continuously.
RAM: 8GB RAM
Viewport and navigating through larger models MAY lag with integrated graphics if you just have 8GB RAM as opposed to 16GB RAM. The additional 8GB RAM will help ANY integrated GPU run faster as explained in my post here. Basically, the extra RAM can act as reserved “memory” for the iGPU to do the processing.
This specific model comes with 8GB RAM, which is fine for very small Revit projects, interior design work, one-floor apartments, light 2D work, and basic student use. However, if you start working on bigger models, you will feel the limits faster. If you can find a version of this laptop with 16GB RAM for a small price difference, get that instead.
The problem is that many thin budget HP laptops use soldered or limited-upgrade RAM, so do not assume you can upgrade this model easily after purchase. If you buy it with 8GB RAM, buy it because you know your Revit work will stay small. If you want to understand the upgrade process in general, check my guide on how to upgrade RAM on a laptop, but verify this exact HP model before assuming it is upgradeable.
How to improve viewport performance despite slow hardware?
If you buy either a laptop like this model or a weaker Ryzen 3/Core i3 and you find yourself working with a bigger model that suddenly slows down on viewport, you can improve performance by upping RAM to 16GB if the laptop supports it. But if that’s not enough, you can either add more RAM, 32GB if supported, or get used to good practice design.
What does that mean? Say if you’re working on small-to-medium models that are around 200MB, it’s possible that you’re using too many functions, unnecessary parts, shading, and other details. To improve performance, you can either split the file and work on each part separately for a faster viewport or purge the entire file to remove unused elements.
Storage & Display: 512GB SSD + HD Touchscreen
The 512GB SSD is a nice upgrade over many cheap laptops that only come with 128GB or 256GB. For Revit, this is enough for school files, small client projects, software, and general storage. You still need external storage or cloud backups if you keep lots of old projects, but 512GB is a good starting point for a budget Revit laptop.
The display is the main compromise. This model has a 15.6″ HD touchscreen display, not FHD. That means the resolution is lower, so you get less workspace for Revit panels, toolbars, properties, the project browser, and the model view. The touchscreen is nice for general use, but for Revit, I would rather have FHD than touch. Still, if the price is low enough and your work is basic, it is acceptable.
| HP 15.6 inch Laptop | |
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
4. Surface Laptop Studio 2
Best 2 in 1 Laptop For Revit

Intel® Core™ i7 13th Gen
16GB LPDDR5 RAM
NVIDIA RTX 4050
512GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD
14.4” 2400 x 1600 2 in 1 Tablet-Laptop w/ Stylus
4.37lbs
5 hours
Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Software
Civil, Mechanical, Aerospace & Aeronautical Engineers
Hardware Overview: Surface Laptop Studio 2
GPU: 4050RTX / Ada RTX 2000 / 4060RTX
The Surface Laptop Studio 2 offers three useful GPU configurations. The first model has a 6GB VRAM RTX 4050 GPU, the second has an 8GB VRAM RTX 4060 GPU, and the third also has 8GB VRAM but uses a workstation GPU: the RTX 2000 Ada. We’ll discuss what that means later.
However, all of these options are generally overkill for Revit alone, as most users won’t find much advantage in a 6GB or 8GB VRAM GPU for typical Revit tasks. Revit still depends heavily on CPU performance, RAM, and good model-management habits, especially if you are mostly drafting, modeling, and working with small-to-medium BIM projects.
The best choice for value is still the RTX 4050 model. While it is still somewhat overpowered for Revit, it’s also significantly cheaper than the RTX 4060 and RTX 2000 Ada configurations. If you are buying this laptop for the form factor, stylus, portability, and the unique tablet-laptop design, the RTX 4050 configuration makes the most sense.
All models come equipped with a 13th Gen Core i7, which provides excellent single-core and multi-core performance. This setup ensures you’ll have high-speed performance for drafting, viewport work, and rendering. It is no longer the newest CPU generation, but it is still more than fast enough for the kind of Revit work most Surface Laptop Studio buyers will be doing.
[Tip] If the Surface Laptop Studio 2 is too expensive, consider the original Surface Laptop Studio, which features a 4GB VRAM GPU and a 12th Gen Core i7. Both models are capable of delivering comparable Revit performance for small-to-medium projects, especially if you are not using GPU renderers or huge linked BIM files. [/tip]
RAM & Storage: Not upgradeable
None of the Surface Laptop Studio models and almost none of the other Surface devices are practical to upgrade. In theory, some parts can be serviced, but for regular users it is risky, difficult, and not something I’d rely on. Thus, you must buy the Studio or the next devices with as much hardware as you’re going to need from day one. For Revit purposes and BIM software, 16GB RAM with 512GB storage is the practical sweet spot, while 8GB RAM with 256GB storage is the minimum for very light work only.
RAM used on these devices is LPDDR5 if you choose the latest Surface Laptop Studio 2 configurations. That’s good for speed and battery efficiency, but again, it also means you should not buy less RAM thinking you’ll upgrade it later.
Other Surface Devices
The Surface Laptop Studio 2 is just one of the many Surface devices that allow you to write with the stylus and draw/design with the stylus on BIM/CAD software like Revit. There’s also:
- Surface Laptop
- Surface Book
- Surface Pro
Surface Pro
The Surface Pro is an even more interesting model than the Surface Laptop Studio 2 because it’s much cheaper and the CPU and iGPU of recent generations pack a lot of punch for BIM software like Revit. Most of the models used by civil engineers or interior designers will show no lag on the Surface Pro as long as you meet two conditions:
- You pick a recent model, which means a recent CPU. Anything from the Surface Pro 7 and newer can work for basic Revit, but the newer the better if you want smoother viewport performance.
- You make sure to have at least 8GB RAM. Some older or base models have only 4GB, and those should be avoided for Revit.
- An upgrade to 16GB, or buying a 16GB configuration from the start, will massively improve performance as discussed earlier.
Note that newer Surface Pro models have been released since the older Surface Pro 9/10 era, but they can be expensive and are often overkill CPU-wise for the average Revit user. If your goal is cheap 2 in 1 sketching and light Revit work, a discounted older Surface Pro with 16GB RAM can still make more sense than paying full price for the newest Surface Pro.
Drawing/Sketching
Whether you buy the Surface Book, Laptop Studio, or the Surface Pro, the drawing features and functions are pretty much the same. The sensitivity and accuracy when drawing are very similar too. In fact, even if you go for much older models, the basic drawing functions and accuracy are still good enough for sketching, markups, and design notes. If you buy cheaper models, you just need to update the software and make sure the pen is compatible.
RAM: 16GB RAM is best
Whereas 8GB RAM is OKAY for laptops with dedicated GPUs, if you end up with an integrated GPU as in the case of the Surface Pro, you want 16GB RAM to make up for the lack of dedicated GPU. We discussed earlier how this works.
If the newest Surface Pro is too expensive and you’re open to buying a Surface Pro 9, Surface Pro 8, Surface Pro 7, or even a Surface Pro 6, then having 16GB of RAM becomes even more crucial—not just for smoother viewport performance, but also for faster performance during drafting and drawing tasks. The extra RAM helps compensate for the lower CPU power in these older models.
| Surface Devices (Pro, Book & Studio) | |
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
5. Dell Precision 7780
Best RTX Ada 3500 Laptop For Revit
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32GB RAM
NVIDIA RTX Ada 3500 12GB vRAM
1TB NVMe SSD
17.3″ FHD Display
Heavy workstation laptop
1-2 hours
This is a workstation laptop.
It’s listed here mostly for informational purposes. I don’t think I’ve ever seen ANYBODY need a workstation GPU just for Revit.
They’re certainly useful for other software, but Revit is mostly limited to interior design work, house plans, and buildings that don’t need much vRAM. Plus, its rendering engine isn’t as hardware-demanding as something like 3DS Max or Maya.
However…
Leaving Revit aside, you might find it useful for other software that requires a lot of GPU rendering power and a very fast CPU to handle extremely large BIM models with LOD 500.
The advantages of workstation laptops compared to regular laptops aren’t really just about the GPU but rather:
- Bigger / better cooling system: Since they’re bigger and thicker, it’s just more ideal for high-end hardware that needs a lot of cooling. The extra space will allow for the CPU & GPU to work at optimum temperature levels.
- Support up to 64GB or even 128GB: On Revit and most BIM software, you may be surprised to find out that those extremely complex models with LOD=500 are going to require more RAM rather than vRAM.
- For example: Plumbing work and mechanical designs of buildings, when very detailed and used in conjunction with other software, can make files as high as 10GB, and this EASILY takes 40-50GB of RAM !!!! In this scenario, a WORKSTATION is a good option IF YOU NEED more than 50GB, as there are only a few laptops that support 64GB RAM or more.
- Display: Workstation laptops are HUGE, and a bigger display means a larger canvas. Combine it with a higher resolution like QHD and your workflow will improve massively since you’ll get a better view of plans. This specific model has a large 17.3″ FHD display, which is useful for size but not as sharp as QHD or 4K.
Workstation GPU vs Gaming GPU
There will be a slight performance gain when working with files that reach around 10GB in size.
But the biggest difference would likely be the reduction or complete elimination of ‘artifacts’ floating around, ‘hardware error boxes,’ and ‘visual inaccuracies.’
However…
This is all speculative. Personally, I’ve never encountered these issues, at least not in a way that noticeably impacted my workflow. Artifacts and visual inaccuracies completely disappeared once I increased my RAM to match the complexity of my model.
Workstation laptops: So why are they Recommended?
They’re just being diplomatic about it.
To avoid any error boxes whatsoever, no matter what you’re doing with the software, you’ll need to make sure your hardware is up to the task.
What might come in handy outside of Revit is the extra vRAM that workstation GPUs offer. This model now comes with an RTX Ada 3500 12GB vRAM, which is much stronger and more recent than older Quadro/RTX workstation options, but it is still overkill for regular Revit work.
On laptops, even the most powerful workstation GPUs usually have similar or less raw performance than high-end gaming GPUs at the same price. Gaming GPUs are often much cheaper. The workstation GPU only starts to make sense if you need certified drivers, workstation stability, special plugins, or company-approved hardware.
Either way, if you’re working with such large models, you’d be better off using a desktop!
| Dell Precision 7780 | |
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
Workstation GPU Performance & Prices: Buyer Beware!
If you MUST buy a workstation GPU because you’ve been forced to buy one (or perhaps you see yourself using software/plugins outside of Revit that explicitly require one), then it’s important for you to distinguish which workstation GPUs are USELESS and OBSOLETE and which ones are WORTH your money.
I’m sure you don’t want to pay $2,000 for a five-year-old GPU that cannot perform better than the GPU inside a $700 laptop.
Please use the following table to get an idea of where each workstation GPU stands compared to regular laptop GPUs:
| Workstation GPU | Consumer Equivalent | Cores/Shaders | Clock Speed | vRAM |
| P500 | MX150- | 256 | 1519 | 2GB |
| M620M | 950M- | 512 | 1018 | 4GB |
| P1000 | 1050GTX | 512 | 1519 | 4GB |
| P2000 | 1050Ti | 768 | 1468 | 4GB |
| T2000 | 1650/1660Ti | 1024 | 1785 | 4GB |
| RTX 5000 | 2080RTX+++ | 3072 | 1350 | 16GB |
| RTX A5000 | ~3080RTX | 6144 | 1695 | 16GB |
| Ada GPU | GPU Equivalent |
Cores/Shaders | Clock Speed | vRAM |
| RTX 5000 | RTX 4090 – | 9728 | 1680MHz | 16GB |
| RTX 4000 | = RTX 4080 | 7424 | Variable | 12GB |
| RTX 3500 | RTX 4070 – | 5120 | Variable | 12GB |
| RTX 3000 | RTX 4070 — | 4608 | Variable | 8GB |
| RTX 2000 | RTX 4060 – | 3072 | Variable | 8GB |
| RTX 1000 | RTX 4050 – | 2560 | Variable | 6GB |
++ much faster. – weaker. = similar performance. There’s a much bigger and more complete list in the next section!
What about MacBooks? Which is the best Apple laptop for Revit?
Unfortunately, Revit, as of 2026, still doesn’t have a native Mac version. However, there are a few ways you can get Revit installed on a MacBook, as shown on the official site here.
As for which MacBook or what MacBook hardware is best for Revit, it depends on how you’re going to launch Revit:
- If you’re going to use a MacBook to NATIVELY install Revit, there is a way (although the official site doesn’t emphasize it). You have to buy a MacBook with an Intel chip, which means one released before Apple switched to its own processors in late 2020. For example, the 2019 16” MacBook Pro has an Intel Core i9 and a 4GB vRAM GPU (Radeon Pro 5500M). You can install Windows natively through Boot Camp and then install Revit. This works fantastically for medium-to-large models, especially if you find a MacBook Pro with 16GB or even 32GB of RAM!
- If you want to buy one of the latest M1, M2, M3, M4, or M5 MacBooks, you are limited to using a virtual machine to launch Windows and then launching Revit within it. This reduces the amount of resources available to run Revit because they’re also being used to run the VM, macOS, and background processes. Communication between the hardware and software within the VM also isn’t as direct as it would be if Revit were installed natively. So, this is a good option IF your models are very small and limited to houses without too many details.
- If you can access a workstation remotely (whether it is a desktop or cloud service used to launch Revit), you can use any laptop to work on Revit remotely, including any MacBook.
How To Buy The Best Laptop For Revit
If you are on a budget and need to buy several machines for your team then you want to give this section a good read so you don’t spend money on unncessary power.
Project Size
The best way to get the right hardware is to look at your files. If files are large you need a higher CPU and better graphics. If files stay below 100MB, then you don’t need to worry on either as much.
If you don’t have access to files then imagine this:
- 10-15 story building for a private school, a small medical center or maybe a bunch of offices then you need NO MORE than 4GB vRAM dGPU ~700$. LOD =500.
- Two-three story houses or apartments only need 2GB vRAM GPU laptops. Even an integrated GPU will do.
- Working collaboratively on bigger projects, like an entire high school campus with highly detailed interior design (LOD=500) will be bog down to 1 fps when using viewport. In this scenario, you’ll need as much vRAM as you can afford.
Revit System Requirements For Laptops
*These recommendations are based on a lecture by AutoDesk University, my past experience and input from several users through our facebook page. They apply to ALL BIM Software including the Revit packages: Revit Structure, Revit Architecture & Revit MEP.
CPU
Revit primarily relies on the CPU.
Picking a good graphics card automatically sets you up with a fast CPU on laptops.
Nonetheless, you should still know a few things about how the software uses the CPU so you can get the best bang for your buck.
a) Revit Functions

Is Revit Multi-Core?
Yes and No.
Revit started as a single-threaded application (having more cores did not improve performance).
Over time more functions and design tasks were made more and more multi-threaded however that only applies for a few functions so the focus should still be single-thread performance.
The tasks that have become more multithreaded are usually those where things need to be ‘rendered on the go’ or visuals. Ex: calculating walls and pipes intersections, loading all elements in views, etc.
Here’s a list of all multi-threaded functions.
Intel CPUs
| CPU | Base(GHz) | Turbo(GHz) | Cores(GHz) |
| i3 10050G1 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 2 |
| i3 10100U | 2.1 | 4.1 | 2 |
| i3-1115G4 | 3 | 4.1 | 2 |
| i3 1215U |
3.3 | 4.4 | 6 |
| i5 1115G4 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 4 |
| i7 1165G7 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 4 |
| i5 1240P |
3.3 | 4.4 | 8 |
| i7 1260P |
3.4 | 4.7 | 8 |
| i5-11300H | 2.6 | 4.4 | 4 |
| i5 11260H | 2.6 | 4.4 | 6 |
| i5 13420H | 1.9 | 4.6 | 8 |
| i5 14450HX | 2.0 | 4.8 | 10 |
| i7 10750H | 2.6 | 5 | 8 |
| i7-11375H | 3.3 | 5 | 4 |
| i7-11370H | 3.3 | 4.8 | 4 |
| i7 12800H | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6+8 |
| i7 13620H | 3.6 | 4.9 | 6+8 |
| i7 13650HX | 3.6 | 4.9 | 6+8 |
| i7 14000HX | 1.9 | 5.4 | 20 |
| i9-11900H | 2.5 | 4.9 | 8 |
| i9-11980HK | 3.3 | 5 | 8 |
|
i9 12900H
|
1.8
|
5
|
6+8
|
|
i9 13900H
|
1.9
|
5.4
|
6+8
|
|
i9
14900HX |
2.3
|
5.4
|
24
|
AMD CPUs
| CPU | Base (GHz) | Turbo (GHz) | Cores(#) |
| AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | 3.8 | 5.3 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | 4 | 5.2 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | 3.3 | 4.9 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | 3.3 | 4.6 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | 3.5 | 5.1 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX | 3.6 | 5.1 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | 3.6 | 4.7 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 3.3 | 4.4 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800U | 1.9 | 4.4 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | 1.8 | 4.3 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS | 3.3 | 4.55 | 6 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 6600H | 3.3 | 4.5 | 6 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600H | 3.3 | 4.2 | 6 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | 2.0 | 4.5 | 8 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5500U | 2.1 | 4.4 | 6 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 7320U |
2.4 | 4.1 | 4 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4 |
Multi-threaded functions are still a small fraction of all the functions on Revit. This isn’t likely to change because most functions are step by step processes: they cannot be “multi-threaded” by nature.
Now if you look at the table, you’ll notice most DECENT modern CPUs today have 6 or more cores and some even have 8 cores. Thus # of cores isn’t likely to be a limiting factor.
TL;DR: Focus on clock speed rather than number of cores.
How much clock speed is fast?
The following is an estimate but it really depends on the CPU generation and stats:
~RECENT Ryzen 3 or Core i3 if all you do is render how a building/house looks from outside.
~6th gen Ryzen 5 or 12th gen Core i5 CPUs for small models that are more detailed as you navigate within.
~6th gen Ryzen 7 or 12th gen Core i7 for detailed large buildings.
~12th gen Core i9 or 6th gen Ryzen 9 for very detailed and complex designs inside very large buildings: plumbing system, detailed building structure, electrical structure, etc…
For more “accurate benchmarks” on which CPU has better “single clock speed” performance check out my post here:
b) Rendering
Rendering is a multi-core task. This is true not just for Revit but for every other software: the cores more you have the faster the rendering.
Now if you’re doing a simple render (two story house), most modern CPUs will do it in a minute or two. The more details and the more realistic the product looks, the longer it’ll take .
- If you are a student: You’ll be limited to small buildings. Render with high quality will only take 20 min with one of the recent Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 CPUs which have about ~6 cores running at 4GHz. Draft quality might take 1 min.
- If you are a professional, you’ll likely come across bigger AND way more detailed high quality renders. If you don’t want to wait 1-2h, get at least a 6 core CPU though (~600-750 dollar laptops).
- However, I would consider investing on a Core i7 Ryzen 7 (8 cores running at ~5GHz) or use Cloud rendering if you want much faster high quality renders. Draft quality as usual it’s instantaneous.
GPU
A) Viewport
This means panning, zooming, orbiting, navigating, doing a walkthrough of a 3D model, etc.
Dedicated GPUs vRAM
This will only be smooth and fast once you have a graphics card that has ‘dedicated video RAM’.
The reason why some computers lag (with very large complex models) despite having a fast CPU and enough RAM is likely lack of vRAM.
Now when you buy a laptop with dedicated graphics keep this in mind:
2-4GB vRAM GPUs:

As you can see in the figure, this is a two story house and it’s only taking 1GB vRAM so you will definitely be fine 2GB vRAM dGPU (they are found on 600 dollar laptops) but it doesn’t hurt get a bit more headroom and buy a 4GB vRAM dGPU. It will also be future proof for much larger structures (~10-20 story buildings).
6GB vRAM dGPUs:
As you can see in the figure I have a 6GB vRAM dGPU.
It’s never made anything “faster” than my 4GB vRAM dGPU.
Viewport will be slightly slow when the structure’s complex, big and has a lot of objects in it (LOD=500) but nothing that will slowdown your workflow.
I personally have not found my 6GB vRAM dGPU useful yet but if you know you’ll be working with much bigger and complex structures AND doing high quality walkthroughs (Ex: 3DS Max), you MIGHT find it useful.
Before upgrading a graphics card though I would try upping RAM to 32-64GB (we’ll talk about that soon).
Viewport: Quadro vs NVIDIA GeForce
I have used one of those Quadro cards ~5 years ago ( K 2000) and I saw no improvement over the 860GTX (~1050Ti). There was a bit more lag with the GeForce 1050Ti (~20 story building) but a quick hardware usage (task manager) revealed that CPU & RAM were choking before even my dGPU (1050Ti) ran out of ‘GPU Power’ (~50% of usage) so if both machines were to have the same CPU & RAM differenes would be minimal.
That was almost 7 years ago now the architecture difference between the consumer gaming cards and workstation gaming cards is minimal so there’s almost no advantage in performance.
However, yes, you will see less artifacting with workstation cards, be able to use some special features and plug-ins but that’s about it.
Workstation GPUs if they have more vRAM will come in handy but Revit doesn’t seem to use more than 6GB vRAM (or even 4GB vRAM) .
Again I have not worked with extremely large models as one would perhaps (a mall) or a large hospital facility (with every building detailed in a single file).
B) Rendering
The Renderer in Revit does not use the dedicated GPU.
All the rendering work is done by the CPU. Look at how all the cores are FULLY being used in the CPU section’s task manager screenshot.
Integrated GPUs vs Dedicated GPU: Rendering
It will still takes ~20 min for a best quality render (settings shown in figure) whether you’ve got a dedicated GPU or not.
So in theory if you want to do the rendering on another laptop or the cloud, you could even settle for a computer that has an integrated GPU (if you don’t mind slightly slow viewport) and as long as your work stays pretty close in size to the above image, there should be no lag with integrated GPUs using viewport.
Ada Workstation GPUs The newest workstation laptops will have an Ada RTX GPU which has much faster CUDA Cores (or shaders) due to both the architecture being different as well as the implementation of AI optimized image processing. However, since Revit’s rendering is CPU-based , they are no more useful than other ‘gaming’ GPUs with the same amount of vRAM. However, if you’re running 3DS Max (which is pretty common among Revit users) or GPU-based renderers, they can DEFINITELY speed up the rendering processing massively. C) Hardware Acceleration: Workstation vs Consumer ‘Gaming’ Graphics Cards As some of you know software like Revit has the option to activate “hardware accelerated graphics” which means “using the GPU to improve performance with the software” as shown below: Any dedicate GPU that has ‘vRAM’ will help improve performance when using viewport as we discussed before. Now if you mean drafting & doing operations on a model being faster consumer ‘gaming’ cards CANNOT do anything here because these are floating point operations and consumer gaming cards are designed for 3D Vector operations. As for workstation GPUs, turning hardware acceleration will also improve viewport and in theory, it should ALSO improve performance when drawing and drafting because these GPUs are specifically designed for floating point operations However, they don’t help. You will notice zero performance gains with workstation cards just like you would with gaming cards. The reason why? Well it doesn’t matter. If I have to guess it may be because Revit doesn’t yet know how to make good use of ANY dedicated GPU for floating point operations like drawing, designing, etc. My experience: Workstation GPUs vs Gaming GPUs For me it has made practically make zero difference. For most people I know , both type of graphics card have performed equally well too. Yes I know, workstation are recommended by AutoDesk but that doesn’t really mean anything. If you ever hear people complaining about their GPU not being recognized by AutoDesk Revit, well I had issues with workstation GPUs too despite being listed in AutoDesk’s list of compatible GPUs too! Once you fix the issue, by updating drives, playing around with options, etc, you will see zero difference between the two. I have compared my 860M desktop with a workstation GPU and saw no difference in visual artifacts, no difference in lag when viewporting, nothing, same performance. Although mileage may vary depending on what you’re doing as some people report ‘artifacting’ and ‘glitches’. However these people still use consumer gaming cards deal with it by clicking OK when an error pops up and keep working. 1650GTX/2050RTX: This is probably the GPU that will be suficient for most of you (I’d say 90%). They sell for as low as 600 dollars compared to a workstation laptop that sells for 2-3k dollars! You’d be saving about 1400-2400 dollars and still getting the same performance when using viewport! Now if you do render on your machine, you’ll probably be able to do it faster on a workstation laptop not because of the workstation GPU but because it’s usually paired with the latest CPU . D) When are Workstation GPUs useful then? As far as I know, workstation GPUs MAY be useful in two instances: 3. RAM RAM is just as important as CPU & GPU. I did not go over it sooner because it is very rare for people to buy insufficient RAM. Even if you don’t buy a laptop with enough RAM you can always upgrade RAM later. Minimum: 8GB As a bare minimum you need 8GB RAM , this will work for students. Revit + Windows + large revit files will take most of it but you will still have about 1GB left for any background process. Rendering: 16GB and Up Ideally, if you’re going to render on a laptop, you want 16GB as a minimum. RAM is where all your files are stored for processing (rendering) so the more you have the more data your CPU has to work with at a given time. For most people, the performance gains after 16GB are insignificant. Viewport: 16GB RAM For Viewport to be smooth when working with very very large models and complex models you want to have at least 16GB RAM. In fact, if you are expiriencing lag with your current rig and you’ve been told it’s due to lack of CPU & GPU power, you might as well try upgrading RAM BEFORE you purchase a new laptop. I’ve seen machines perform x3 faster with 16 GB RAM (most of these only had 4 or 8 to begin with). 32-64GB RAM: Special Cases Some people will not work with interior design projects or build/house designs as seen in Civil Engineering but rather with detailed HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems. These instances may require 32-64GB RAM for viewport to be smooth. For those models, especially when there’s a lot of ductwork, piping, and mechanical equipment involved. You better buy a laptop that has the option to upgrade RAM all the way to 64GB RAM because there’s a high chance you MIGHT need the extra RAM.
GPU
Shaders
vRAM
Speed
MX150
384
2GB-4GB
1532
MX250
384
2GB-4GB
1582
MX 230
256
2-4GB
1519
MX 350
640
2-4GB
1354
MX 450
896
2-4GB
1580
1050
640
2GB-4GB
1493
MX550
1024
4GB
1320
Name
Cores
vRAM
Speed
1050 Ti
768
4GB
1620
1650
1024
4GB
1560
1060
1280
6GB
1670
1660 Ti
1536
6GB
1590
3050Ti
2560
4GB
1485
4050
2370
6B
2560
2060
1920
6GB
1680
2080
2944
8GB
1710
2070
2304
8GB
1620
3060
3584
8GB
1780
4060
3072
8GB
2370
3070
5888
8GB
1730
3080
8704
10GB
1710
4070
4608
8GB
2175
4080
7424
12GB
2175
Workstation GPU
Consumer Equivalent
Cores/Shaders
Clock Speed
vRAM
P500
MX150-
256
1519
2GB
P520
MX150
384
1493
2GB
K2100M
GT 750M
576
667
2GB
K3100
765M-
768
706
4GB
P620
MX250/1050
512
1442
4GB
M620M
950M-
512
1018
4GB
M1000M
950M
512
1072
4GB
Pro WX 3200
RX 550
1082
640
4GB
M2000M
950M/960M
640
1197
4GB
M1200
960GTX
640
1150
4GB
P1000
1050GTX
512
1519
4GB
P2000
1050Ti
768
1468
4GB
T2000
1650/1660Ti
1024
1785
4GB
T1000
1650-
768
1455
4GB
RTX 3000
2070RTX+
1280
1380
6GB
RTX 4000
2070/2080
2560
1560
8GB
RTX 5000
2080RTX+++
3072
1350
16GB
RTX A2000
~3050Ti
2560
1200
4GB
RTX A3000
~3060RTX
4096
1560
6GB
RTX A4000
~3070RTX
5120
1560
8GB
RTX A5000
~3080RTX
6144
1695
16GB
Ada GPU
GPU
EquivalentCores/Shaders
Clock Speed
vRAM
RTX 5000
RTX 4090 –
9728
1680Hz
16GB
RTX 4000
= RTX 4080
7424
12GB
RTX 3500
RTX 4070 –
5120
12GB
RTX 3000
RTX 4070 —
4608
8GB

– Launching the software FAST

256GB vs 512GB vs 1TB (SSD Space)
256GB: found on most laptops and desktops. You can install Windows, Revit and still have about 100GB left (Windows ~50GB + Revit 40GB) , the problem is you never have just revit open you’ll also be running PhotoShop, Navisworks and probably AutoCAD + other software. If you are a student, you are likely to be okay with this much and there will be no need for upgrades.
512GB: This is the minimum for someone who’s already working as an engineer. Revit Files can take up to 700MB each . You don’t have to buy a laptop with 512GB (most will charge you way more money for 512GB) , what you can do is buy a separate SSD (~40 bucks) and do the upgrade yourself. I have a tutorial on how to do the SSD Upgrade here.
Display
It isn’t a concern for laptops because there isn’t much variety of displays on laptops.
In other words, most display will have the same specs.
Matte Display
However some laptops have a matte display which are easier on the eyes as the amount of glares is massively reduced. You aren’t likely to find this type of display though but you can always add an external filter.
IPS vs TN
Most laptops have IPS displays. They don’t have the best color accuracy but they’re far better than TN displays.
Most Revit users will see zero difference between these two types of displays though. It’s only going to be a concern for photographers and Photoshop users or anyone who has to print their work.
Resolution
More resolution means more screen space. More screen space means larger canvas and quicker access to interface bars with tools/functions.
Most laptops have 1080p, FHD (Full HD) resolutions and that’s totally fine for Revit.
However, you would be better off with 2k. The problem is that theyre USUALLY found on laptops above 1500 dollars . Some laptops however will have a QHD display for ~700 dollars (see Lenovo Ideapad 5i Pro).
Comments
If you know you are going to work on very large projects on Revit with a low budget. Not all hope is lost, you can also eliminate any lag by optimizing file management. Use worksets, linked files, and a clean family library and you may not even need to find a new laptop or computer. Revit isn’t as hardware demanding as people would like you to believe (at least for more users).
If you have any questions or comments please leave a comment below.
Author Profile
- I am physicist and electrical engineer. My knowledge in computer software and hardware stems for my years spent doing research in optics and photonics devices and running simulations through various programming languages. My goal was to work for the quantum computing research team at IBM but Im now working with Astrophysical Simulations through Python. Most of the science related posts are written by me, the rest have different authors but I edited the final versions to fit the site's format.






very helpful, thanks 🙂
Nice suggestions
Wow, the most useful post.